- June
21
2025 - 5

MyCryptoexBank Comparison Tool
Asset Breadth
Number of trading pairs available
Fee Transparency
Publicly disclosed fee structure
Liquidity
Daily trading volume in USD billion
Security Posture
Audit reports and cold storage claims
Regulatory Status
Licensed by financial authorities
User Support
Response time and support channels
Detailed Feature Comparison
Exchange | Asset Count | Fee Schedule | Daily Volume (USD bn) | Security Highlights | Regulatory Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MyCryptoexBank | ~30 niche tokens | Undisclosed - 0.3-2% per trade | ~0.02 | Unknown - cold-storage claims unverified | Listed in scam-tracking databases |
Coinbase | 235+ | 0% - 3.99% (varies by order type) | ~14 | Multi-signature wallets, 98% cold storage, insurance $250M | Licensed by FCA, SEC, EU |
Kraken | 350+ | 0% - 0.4% (maker/taker) | ~9 | Cold storage, third-party audits, insurance coverage | FCA, FINMA, NYDFS licensing |
Binance | 158 (US) / 500+ global | 0% - 0.6% (maker/taker) | ~12 | SAFU fund, multi-sig wallets, periodic audits | Varies by jurisdiction |
Gemini | 150+ | 0.5% - 3.49% | ~2 | Full-reserve banking model, SOC 2 Type II compliance | NYDFS charter, FCA registration |
Important Notes
- MyCryptoexBank lacks transparency in fee structures and security details.
- It is listed in scam-tracking databases and not licensed by major regulators.
- Trading volume and liquidity are significantly lower than top exchanges.
- Support is limited to email tickets with slow response times.
Recommendation
Unless you specifically need access to a new token only listed on MyCryptoexBank, most traders are better off using a well-regulated exchange such as Coinbase, Kraken, Binance, or Gemini for better security, transparency, and liquidity.
When evaluating a MyCryptoexBank a crypto‑exchange platform focused on crypto‑to‑crypto trading and supporting emerging token projects, you quickly discover it lives in the shadow of industry giants. It appears on CoinMarketCap, which gives it a veneer of legitimacy, yet the lack of public data on fees, liquidity and security makes the MyCryptoexBank review a cautionary exercise. Below we break down what the exchange actually offers, how it stacks up against the big players, and which (if any) traders might still find a niche use case.
TL;DR
- MyCryptoexBank focuses on crypto‑to‑crypto pairs and emerging tokens; it does not support fiat deposits.
- Liquidity and trading depth are thin compared with Coinbase, Kraken, Binance or Gemini.
- Security and regulatory details are vague; the platform shows up in scam‑tracking databases.
- Fees, supported assets and customer support information are not publicly disclosed.
- Most traders are better off using a well‑regulated exchange unless they need a very specific new token that MyCryptoexBank lists.
What Is MyCryptoexBank?
Founded sometime before 2022, MyCryptoexBank positions itself as a launchpad for new cryptocurrency projects, offering a marketplace where these tokens can find their first liquidity. The platform’s core value proposition is a crypto‑to‑crypto marketplace that avoids the complexities of KYC‑heavy fiat integration. This niche focus can appeal to developers looking for a quick listing, but it also means everyday investors cannot fund the account with pounds, euros or dollars - they must first acquire a supported crypto on another exchange and then transfer it in.
How Does It Compare to the Market Leaders?
To understand the trade‑offs, we measured five key dimensions: asset breadth, fee transparency, liquidity, security posture, and regulatory compliance. The data for MyCryptoexBank comes from limited public sources and user reviews, whereas the big names publish detailed reports.
Exchange | Asset count (incl. tokens) | Fee schedule (maker/taker) | Average daily volume (USDbn) | Security highlights | Regulatory status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MyCryptoexBank | ~30 niche tokens (mostly newer projects) | Undisclosed - users report 0.3‑2% per trade | ~0.02bn | Unknown - no public audit, cold‑storage claims unverified | Listed in some scam‑tracking databases; no clear licence |
Coinbase | 235+ | 0% - 3.99% (varies by order type) | ~14bn | Multi‑signature wallets, 98% cold storage, insurance $250M | Licensed by FCA (UK), SEC (US), EU registration |
Kraken | 350+ | 0% - 0.4% (maker/taker) | ~9bn | Cold storage, regular third‑party audits, insurance coverage | FCA, FINMA, NYDFS licensing |
Binance | 158 (US) / 500+ global | 0% - 0.6% (maker/taker) | ~12bn | SAFU fund, multi‑sig wallets, periodic audits | Varies by jurisdiction; facing regulatory reviews in EU |
Gemini | 150+ | 0.5% - 3.49% | ~2bn | Full‑reserve banking model, SOC2 TypeII compliance | NYDFS charter, FCA registration (UK) |
Fees, Trading Pairs, and Minimum Deposits
MyCryptoexBank does not publish a fee schedule on its website. Community posts on Revain suggest users have encountered maker fees around 0.3% and taker fees close to 2%. By contrast, the industry standard for high‑volume traders on Kraken hovers near 0.04%. The exchange also limits itself to a handful of crypto‑to‑crypto pairs, mainly pairing new tokens against BTC, ETH and USDT. Minimum deposit thresholds are not disclosed, forcing newcomers to guess the amount required to execute a trade without triggering excessive slippage.

Security and Regulatory Landscape
Security is the biggest unknown. The platform claims to keep a portion of assets in cold storage, but no audit reports or third‑party attestations are available. In 2024, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) added MyCryptoexBank to a watch‑list of entities flagged for insufficient AML procedures. While the exchange is listed on CoinMarketCap, that alone does not guarantee compliance. Users should treat the platform as a higher‑risk environment, especially because any loss could be irrecoverable without insurance or a clear custodial policy.
User Experience and Support
Design-wise, the web UI is functional but feels dated. It lacks advanced order types such as stop‑limit or trailing stop, which seasoned traders rely on for risk management. Customer support is limited to an email ticketing system; response times reported on public forums average 48‑72hours. In contrast, Coinbase offers 24/7 live chat and a comprehensive knowledge base, while Binance provides multilingual support channels.
Who Might Still Use MyCryptoexBank?
If you are a developer or token holder of a brand‑new project that has secured a listing on MyCryptoexBank, the platform can give you a modest launchpad without the high listing fees of the big exchanges. Small‑scale arbitrage traders might also exploit occasional price gaps between MyCryptoexBank and larger venues, but the thin liquidity often leads to wide spreads, eroding any potential profit.
For most retail investors seeking stability, transparency, and a broad asset universe, the exchange falls short. Its niche focus is its only differentiator, and even that can be covered by decentralized exchanges (DEXes) that provide on‑chain trading without a central custodian.
Bottom Line
MyCryptoexBank is a modest, crypto‑centric exchange that tries to help new tokens find a market. The upside is limited token exposure; the downside is a lack of fee clarity, uncertain security measures, and questionable regulatory standing. Unless you have a concrete need for a specific token only listed there, you’re likely better off with a regulated, transparent platform such as Coinbase, Kraken, Binance or Gemini.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is MyCryptoexBank regulated in the UK?
No. The exchange is not a registered FCA‑licensed entity, and it appears on a regulatory watch‑list for possible AML shortcomings.
What cryptocurrencies can I trade on MyCryptoexBank?
The platform mainly offers about 30 crypto‑to‑crypto pairs, focusing on newer tokens paired with BTC, ETH or USDT. It does not support fiat‑to‑crypto bundles.
How do the fees compare with larger exchanges?
Public data is scarce, but user reports suggest maker fees near 0.3% and taker fees up to 2%. Larger platforms like Kraken or Binance charge below 0.5% for most high‑volume traders.
Is my money safe on MyCryptoexBank?
Security details are vague. The exchange claims cold storage, but without audit reports or insurance, the risk level is higher than on regulated venues.
Can I use MyCryptoexBank for day‑trading?
Day‑trading is possible, but thin liquidity and wide spreads can cause slippage, making the experience less efficient than on high‑volume exchanges.
Brooklyn O'Neill
June 21, 2025 AT 06:43Thanks for the thorough breakdown, this really helps anyone deciding where to trade.
Ciaran Byrne
June 21, 2025 AT 12:16Clear and concise, good summary.
Carthach Ó Maonaigh
June 21, 2025 AT 17:50Alright, let me lay it out straight: this exchange looks like a cheap knock‑off of the real deals. First off, the asset list is a sad handful of obscure tokens that nobody cares about. Second, they hide their fees behind a vague "undisclosed" label, which screams cash‑grab. Third, the daily volume is practically a drop in the bucket – you’ll be fighting slippage all day. Fourth, security? They claim cold storage but offer no audit, so it’s a blind guess. Fifth, they’re not regulated anywhere, which means no protection if things go south. Sixth, support is just an email form that takes days to answer, if it even gets answered. Seventh, the UI looks like it was designed in 2012 with no modern features. Eighth, you can’t even do fiat deposits, so you’re forced to hop on another platform first. Ninth, the risk indicators all light up red, which should be a huge warning flag. Tenth, reviews on scam‑tracking sites are plentiful and not a coincidence. Eleventh, liquidity is so thin you’ll see price jumps with tiny trades. Twelfth, the token listings are random and not vetted, increasing the chance of rug pulls. Thirteenth, the lack of transparency makes it impossible to trust the platform. Fourteenth, you’ll end up paying more in hidden fees than you’d save on exotic pairs. Fifteenth, the whole thing feels like a playground for scammers rather than a serious exchange. Finally, unless you have a very niche need for a token that only lives there, you’re better off sticking with the big, regulated names.
Kamva Ndamase
June 21, 2025 AT 23:23Yo, this place is a total roulette – you might strike gold or get burned, but the odds are stacked against you. The fees are a mystery, the security is a joke, and the support? Don’t even bother.
bhavin thakkar
June 22, 2025 AT 04:56Listen up, everybody – the lack of transparency here is a red flag the size of the Empire State Building. When an exchange refuses to publish its fee schedule, you can bet they’re pocketing a huge cut. Add the non‑existent audit reports and you have a recipe for disaster. If you value your crypto, steer clear.
Marie Salcedo
June 22, 2025 AT 10:30Great overview! It really clarifies why most traders stick with the big names. Keep the info coming.
Kristen Rws
June 22, 2025 AT 16:03i think its defintely not worth the risk.
Fionnbharr Davies
June 22, 2025 AT 21:36From a philosophical standpoint, the trade‑off between decentralisation and regulation is crucial. While niche platforms can foster innovation, the lack of consumer safeguards creates a moral hazard. One must weigh the potential upside against the systemic risk.
Lisa Strauss
June 23, 2025 AT 03:10Totally agree – for most of us the peace of mind from a regulated exchange is priceless.
Darrin Budzak
June 23, 2025 AT 08:43I’ve seen a few folks try this place, and they all end up frustrated with the slow support and vague fees.
Andrew McDonald
June 23, 2025 AT 14:16Indeed, the lack of transparency is a serious concern. 🙂
Enya Van der most
June 23, 2025 AT 19:50Hey team, if you’re chasing that next big token, think twice – the risk/reward ratio here is off the charts and not in a good way.
Eugene Myazin
June 24, 2025 AT 01:23Just a heads‑up, there are plenty of legit DEXs that let you trade these niche tokens without handing over custody.
karyn brown
June 24, 2025 AT 06:56Honestly, this sounds like a classic scam setup 😒. Avoid at all costs!
Megan King
June 24, 2025 AT 12:30Right, safety first. If you’re not comfortable, stick with what’s proven.
Keith Cotterill
June 24, 2025 AT 18:03One must question the patriotism of supporting unregulated entities; it undermines the economic sovereignty of our great nation!!
C Brown
June 24, 2025 AT 23:36Oh sure, because the only thing that matters is how many buzzwords you can cram into a paragraph. Real risk, real losses.
Noel Lees
June 25, 2025 AT 05:10Anyone actually using this platform? 🤔 The lack of clarity on fees alone should be a deal‑breaker for serious traders.
Adeoye Emmanuel
June 25, 2025 AT 10:43From a philosophical perspective, the absence of accountability erodes trust, which is the foundation of any financial system.
Raphael Tomasetti
June 25, 2025 AT 16:16TL;DR: low liquidity, high risk, no regulation – not worth it.
Jenny Simpson
June 25, 2025 AT 21:50Well, maybe the author just loves drama. The facts speak for themselves.
Marie-Pier Horth
June 26, 2025 AT 03:23Honestly, this whole review feels like a melodramatic soap opera – let’s keep it factual.
F Yong
June 26, 2025 AT 08:56Sure, the “regulators” are probably part of a grand conspiracy to keep us all in line. 😉
Sara Jane Breault
June 26, 2025 AT 14:30Appreciate the concise recap – it makes the decision process much easier.
Alie Thompson
June 26, 2025 AT 20:03It is imperative that we, as a community, uphold the highest standards of ethical trading. When platforms obscure essential information, they betray the trust of their users. Transparency is not a luxury; it is a fundamental right. The lack of disclosed fees, ambiguous security practices, and absent regulatory oversight form a trifecta of danger. By engaging with such entities, we inadvertently endorse a culture of opacity. In a market that already suffers from volatility, adding clandestine operations only amplifies risk. Moreover, the potential for financial loss extends beyond the individual to the broader ecosystem, undermining confidence in crypto as a whole. It is our moral duty to demand accountability and to steer clear of venues that refuse to provide it. Only through collective vigilance can we safeguard the integrity of our investments.
Carthach Ó Maonaigh
June 27, 2025 AT 01:36Bottom line: stay away.