Quantum Computing Threat to Crypto Encryption: What You Need to Know Before 2035

  • December

    4

    2025
  • 5
Quantum Computing Threat to Crypto Encryption: What You Need to Know Before 2035

Crypto Address Vulnerability Checker

Check if your Bitcoin or Ethereum address is vulnerable to quantum computing attacks. Addresses with exposed public keys are at risk of quantum attacks.

Right now, billions of dollars in Bitcoin and Ethereum are sitting on blockchains protected by encryption that quantum computing could break in minutes. Not tomorrow. Not next year. But soon enough that the clock is already ticking.

How Quantum Computers Break Crypto

Most cryptocurrencies rely on Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) to secure your wallet. When you send Bitcoin, your signature is generated using a private key tied to a public key. Anyone on the blockchain can see the public key, but only you hold the private key. That’s how it stays safe.

Enter Shor’s algorithm. Developed in 1994, this quantum math trick can factor huge numbers and solve the math behind ECC in seconds - something that would take classical supercomputers thousands of years. Once a quantum computer is powerful enough, it can take a public key from a Bitcoin transaction and reverse-engineer the private key. Boom. Your coins are gone.

It’s not theoretical. In 2025, Deloitte confirmed that a sufficiently advanced quantum computer could crack a Bitcoin signature in under 30 minutes. That’s faster than the 10-minute block confirmation time. If the quantum computer gets the public key before the transaction is confirmed, it can steal the funds before the network even realizes what’s happening.

Who’s at Risk? The 25% of Bitcoin That’s Already Exposed

Not all Bitcoin is equally vulnerable. The real danger lies in address reuse and outdated transaction types.

About 25% of all Bitcoin in circulation is stored in addresses where the public key is already visible on the blockchain. These include:

  • P2PK (Pay-to-Public-Key) - Old-style addresses from before 2012. The public key is right there in the transaction.
  • Reused P2PKH (Pay-to-Public-Key-Hash) - If you ever sent Bitcoin from the same address more than once, your public key got exposed the second time you spent from it.
Once that public key is out there, it’s just a matter of time before a quantum computer turns it into your private key. You don’t need to be hacked. You don’t need to click a link. Your coins are vulnerable just by existing on the chain.

Reddit user u/CryptoPrepper2025 moved 5.2 BTC after reading Deloitte’s report. They didn’t wait for proof. They acted. And they’re not alone. Forum traffic around quantum threats spiked 300% between August and September 2025.

What About Ethereum and Other Chains?

Ethereum uses the same ECDSA signature scheme as Bitcoin. So yes - it’s just as vulnerable. The only difference? Ethereum’s development team is actively planning upgrades. The Ethereum Magicians forum estimated a minimum 18 to 24 months of work to integrate quantum-resistant signatures into the protocol. That’s not a quick fix. It’s a full network overhaul.

Some newer blockchains are already ahead. Projects like QANplatform and IOTA use lattice-based cryptography - a type of math that even quantum computers struggle with. But together, they make up less than 0.1% of the total crypto market cap. Most of the value is still sitting on vulnerable chains.

An old exposed wallet and a new secure wallet being carried by a hero, while shadowy figures collect glowing data from the air.

Quantum Attacks Are Already Happening - Even If You Can’t See Them

The biggest threat isn’t a sudden blackout. It’s the quiet, long-game attack called “Harvest Now, Decrypt Later” (HNDL).

Imagine a nation-state or well-funded hacker group collecting every Bitcoin transaction ever made. They don’t need to crack them now. They just need to store them. Then, when a quantum computer hits the right power level - maybe in 2035 - they decrypt everything at once. All the coins from 2013, 2017, 2021. All the wallets that reused addresses. All the early adopters who thought they were safe.

The Federal Reserve’s October 2025 report calls this “a present, active, and unavoidable data privacy risk.” That’s not fearmongering. It’s intelligence analysis. The NSA has been working on this since at least 2013, with a $80 million program called “Penetrating Hard Targets.” If they’re collecting data now, they’re already ahead of the curve.

What’s Being Done? The Race for Quantum-Resistant Crypto

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been running a global competition since 2016 to find encryption that survives quantum attacks. In 2022, they picked four finalists. By August 2025, they finalized the standards:

  • CRYSTALS-Kyber - For encrypting data
  • CRYSTALS-Dilithium - The main replacement for ECDSA signatures
  • FALCON - For smaller signatures, like in mobile wallets
  • SPHINCS+ - A backup option, slower but ultra-reliable
Now the hard part: getting every blockchain, exchange, wallet, and bank to switch. That’s not a software update. It’s a hard fork. For Bitcoin, that means convincing thousands of miners, developers, and users to agree on one change. It’s messy. It’s slow. It’s politically explosive.

Coinbase, Chainlink, and 27 other major crypto players formed the Post-Quantum Cryptography Alliance in September 2025. Their goal? Coordinate the transition. But even they admit it will take 5 to 10 years to fully deploy these new standards across the ecosystem.

What Should You Do Right Now?

You don’t need to panic. But you do need to act - and fast.

Here’s your checklist:

  1. Check your addresses. Use a blockchain explorer like Blockchain.com or Etherscan. If you’ve ever spent from an address more than once, your public key is exposed.
  2. Move your coins. Send all your Bitcoin or Ethereum from old addresses to brand-new ones. Never reuse an address again.
  3. Avoid P2PK. If you’re holding Bitcoin in a wallet older than 2012, move it. These are the most vulnerable.
  4. Use hardware wallets. They’re not quantum-proof, but they keep your private key offline - making it harder for any attacker to get it, quantum or not.
  5. Stay informed. Follow updates from NIST, the Post-Quantum Cryptography Alliance, and major exchanges. The next big move will be announced in public.
Coinbase’s October 2025 guide says it best: “Never reuse addresses” is the single most effective defense you have today. It costs nothing. It takes 10 minutes. And it could save your life’s savings.

Children placing coins into a vault guarded by an owl in a library of quantum-resistant crypto books with glowing runes.

When Will It Happen? The Timeline Debate

Experts disagree on when quantum computers will be powerful enough. Here’s the range:

  • 2030-2035: BCG and the Federal Reserve say there’s a better than 50% chance quantum computers can break RSA-2048 by then. That’s the same math behind ECC.
  • 2040-2045: IBM researchers argue that error correction and cooling requirements will delay practical attacks until then.
  • 2028-2032: Some cryptographers think state actors already have prototype machines that can handle smaller keys - meaning they might be targeting older, weaker wallets right now.
The truth? No one knows. But the Federal Reserve’s Megan Rodden says it best: “The real risk starts long before Q-Day.”

Why This Matters Beyond Bitcoin

This isn’t just about crypto. The same quantum threat applies to:

  • Banking systems using RSA for secure transfers
  • Government documents encrypted with ECC
  • Medical records, military communications, even your email
Stablecoins are especially worrying. The July 2025 Genius Act tied them to traditional finance - meaning a quantum breach could collapse both crypto and fiat systems at once. The American Bankers Association warned that 78 of the top 100 U.S. banks now offer crypto services. Most aren’t ready.

The quantum-resistant cryptography market is expected to grow from $150 million in 2025 to $2.1 billion by 2030. That’s not hype. That’s institutional demand.

Final Thought: You’re Not Too Late - But You’re Running Out of Time

Quantum computing won’t suddenly destroy crypto. It won’t make your wallet vanish overnight. But if you’re holding coins in an old, reused address, you’re already playing Russian roulette with your private key.

The good news? You can fix it. Right now. For free. In minutes.

The bad news? If you wait until headlines scream “Quantum Hack!” - it’ll be too late. The data’s already been harvested. The keys are already being calculated.

Don’t wait for someone else to warn you. Check your addresses. Move your coins. Never reuse them again.

The future of crypto isn’t just about innovation. It’s about survival.

Can quantum computers already hack Bitcoin today?

No. Current quantum computers, like IBM’s 433-qubit Osprey chip, aren’t powerful enough to break Bitcoin’s encryption. But they’re getting closer. The real danger isn’t today - it’s the data being collected now for future decryption. That’s why experts warn about "harvest now, decrypt later" attacks.

What percentage of Bitcoin is vulnerable to quantum attacks?

As of October 2025, Deloitte estimated that about 25% of all Bitcoin in circulation is stored in addresses where the public key is exposed on the blockchain - primarily from reused P2PKH addresses or old P2PK addresses. These are the ones at immediate risk once quantum computers become powerful enough.

How long would it take a quantum computer to crack a Bitcoin private key?

According to Deloitte’s October 2025 analysis, a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could derive a Bitcoin private key from its public key in under 30 minutes. That’s faster than the 10-minute block confirmation time, meaning theft could happen before the network even confirms the transaction.

What is "harvest now, decrypt later"?

It’s a strategy where attackers collect encrypted data - like public keys from Bitcoin transactions - today and store it. Once a quantum computer powerful enough to break the encryption is built, they decrypt everything at once. This means your coins could be stolen years after you sent them, even if you never did anything wrong.

Are there any cryptocurrencies that are already quantum-resistant?

Yes - but they’re rare. Projects like QANplatform and IOTA use lattice-based cryptography, which is believed to be secure against quantum attacks. However, as of October 2025, these coins make up less than 0.1% of the total crypto market cap. Most major blockchains still rely on vulnerable ECDSA signatures.

What can I do to protect my crypto now?

Move your coins from old or reused addresses to brand-new ones. Never reuse an address again. Use a hardware wallet to keep your private key offline. Check your transaction history with a blockchain explorer. If you’ve spent from an address more than once, it’s already exposed. Moving your funds now is the single most effective step you can take.

Will Bitcoin or Ethereum update to quantum-resistant crypto?

Ethereum is actively researching quantum-resistant upgrades and estimates a 18-24 month development cycle. Bitcoin has no official plan yet - changing its core encryption would require a hard fork and near-universal agreement from miners and users. The transition is technically possible but politically and logistically very difficult.

Is my crypto safe if I use a hardware wallet?

Hardware wallets protect your private key from online hacks - but they don’t make your address immune to quantum attacks. If your public key is already on the blockchain (because you reused an address), a quantum computer can still crack it. The wallet keeps your key safe - but if the key was already exposed, it doesn’t matter.

When will quantum computers be able to break crypto?

Experts estimate between 2030 and 2045. BCG and the Federal Reserve say there’s a better than 50% chance by 2035. IBM believes error correction challenges will delay practical attacks until 2045. The uncertainty is real - but the threat is not. The clock is ticking, and the data is already being collected.

Should I sell my crypto because of quantum threats?

No. Selling out of fear won’t solve the problem - and you might miss future gains. Instead, move your coins to new, non-reused addresses. That’s free, fast, and effective. Quantum threats are about cryptography, not value. Protect your keys, not your portfolio.

Similar News

27 Comments

  • Neal Schechter

    Neal Schechter

    December 6, 2025 AT 01:55

    Just moved all my BTC from that old 2013 address yesterday. Took 8 minutes. No big deal. If you're still holding on to reused P2PKH addresses, you're basically leaving your front door wide open and wondering why someone stole your TV.

    Quantum computers ain't magic. They just do math faster. And if your key's already on-chain? You're already hacked. You just don't know it yet.

  • Adam Bosworth

    Adam Bosworth

    December 7, 2025 AT 21:29

    lol so u think ur 0.05 btc is safe? lmao. u dont even know what a qubit is but u wanna talk about quantum? go back to your memecoin trading u clown. the real players are already moving. u just gonna cry when ur ‘life savings’ vanish like a fomo trade.

  • Renelle Wilson

    Renelle Wilson

    December 9, 2025 AT 07:51

    It’s important to recognize that while the technical threat is real, the human response is what truly determines outcome. Many individuals are unaware of address reuse, not out of negligence, but because the interface design of wallets has historically not emphasized this critical behavior. The onus should not be entirely on end users to understand cryptographic theory - it should be on developers to build systems that prevent error by default. This isn’t just a crypto issue; it’s a UX design failure that mirrors decades of security missteps across digital infrastructure.

    Let’s not just tell people to move their coins. Let’s make it impossible for them to accidentally expose their public keys in the first place.

  • Elizabeth Miranda

    Elizabeth Miranda

    December 10, 2025 AT 17:50

    Interesting read. I’ve been holding since 2017 and never reused an address - just didn’t know why it mattered until now. Thanks for the clarity.

    Also, hardware wallets are great, but if your public key is already out there, they’re like a safe with the combination written on the outside. Still better than nothing, though.

  • Chloe Hayslett

    Chloe Hayslett

    December 12, 2025 AT 16:59

    Oh wow, the elite crypto bros are finally scared of something that’s been obvious since 2018. Took you long enough. Meanwhile, China’s been quietly building quantum processors since 2020 and we’re still debating whether to ‘move our coins.’

    Wake up, America. This isn’t a ‘crypto problem.’ It’s a national security failure.

  • Jonathan Sundqvist

    Jonathan Sundqvist

    December 14, 2025 AT 07:13

    imagine being this worried about something that might not even happen for another decade. i mean yeah sure move your coins but like… chill. we got time. also why are we even talking about this like its a bomb going off? its just math. and math can be fixed.

  • Annette LeRoux

    Annette LeRoux

    December 15, 2025 AT 04:31

    So… if I moved my coins to a new address in 2022, but the old one still has a balance… is that old one still at risk? 🤔

    Also, why do we keep using the same math for everything? Like… why not just switch everything to lattice-based now? Is it really that hard? 🤷‍♀️

  • Jerry Perisho

    Jerry Perisho

    December 16, 2025 AT 16:39

    Check your addresses. Move coins. Don’t reuse. That’s it. No drama. No panic. Just do the thing.

    Blockchain explorers are free. Wallets are free. Time is free. Use them.

  • Vincent Cameron

    Vincent Cameron

    December 17, 2025 AT 11:40

    There’s a deeper question here: if a quantum computer can crack your private key, does your ownership ever truly exist? Or is it just a temporary illusion maintained by the latency of classical computation? We treat crypto as if it’s permanent property, but in reality, it’s just a snapshot of a moment in time - one that quantum mechanics could erase with a single calculation.

    Perhaps the real vulnerability isn’t the algorithm - it’s our belief in permanence itself.

  • Noriko Robinson

    Noriko Robinson

    December 19, 2025 AT 00:58

    Okay so I just checked my wallet and turns out I reused an address back in 2020 when I sent a small amount to pay for a coffee. I didn't even think about it. Now I'm freaking out. I'm moving everything to a new address right now. Thanks for the wake up call. I wish more people knew this stuff. Why isn't this in every wallet app? Like a pop-up or something? I feel so naive right now.

  • ronald dayrit

    ronald dayrit

    December 19, 2025 AT 20:46

    Consider this: the entire structure of digital trust is built on assumptions of computational asymmetry - that one-way functions are truly one-way. Quantum computing doesn’t break encryption so much as it reveals that the foundation was always a house of cards, propped up by the slow pace of classical physics. The real crisis isn’t technological - it’s epistemological. We believed we could outsource security to mathematics, but mathematics, like all human constructs, is subject to the evolution of understanding.

    What we are witnessing is not the collapse of crypto, but the collapse of our illusion of control. The quantum age doesn’t destroy trust - it forces us to rebuild it, not on the illusion of invincibility, but on the humility of adaptation.

  • Yzak victor

    Yzak victor

    December 20, 2025 AT 23:02

    bro i just moved my btc to a new address and it felt so good. like cleaning out your closet after 10 years. no drama, no stress. just hit send. done.

    also if you’re still using a software wallet for more than 0.1 btc… why? just get a ledger. it’s like 70 bucks. worth it.

  • Holly Cute

    Holly Cute

    December 22, 2025 AT 10:00

    Oh wow, so now we’re supposed to panic because some guy at Deloitte said ‘under 30 minutes’? Let me guess - the same Deloitte that told us stablecoins were ‘low-risk’ in 2022? Or that NFTs were ‘the future of art’?

    Quantum computing is a distraction. The real threat is centralized exchanges, KYC, and regulators freezing wallets. Let’s not pretend this is some grand crypto apocalypse when the biggest risk is still a 22-year-old intern with admin access to Coinbase’s backend.

  • Josh Rivera

    Josh Rivera

    December 23, 2025 AT 19:00

    Of course the ‘experts’ are saying ‘move your coins’ - they’ve been saying that since 2014. Meanwhile, the same people who told you to ‘HODL’ are now telling you to ‘move your coins.’ So which is it? Are you a prophet or a charlatan?

    And why are we still using the same signatures from 2009? Because Bitcoin is a religion, not a technology. And like all religions, it refuses to evolve until it’s too late.

  • Billye Nipper

    Billye Nipper

    December 25, 2025 AT 12:39

    PLEASE. PLEASE. PLEASE. Do not ignore this. I know it’s overwhelming. I know it feels like too much. But you can do this. One step at a time. Check your addresses. One. By. One.

    And if you’re feeling scared - that’s okay. You’re not alone. Many of us are in the same boat. Let’s support each other. Share your experience. Help someone else move their coins. This isn’t just about money - it’s about dignity. About protecting what’s yours.

    You’ve got this. 💪❤️

  • Roseline Stephen

    Roseline Stephen

    December 27, 2025 AT 08:09

    Interesting perspective. I’ve been researching this for months. The technical details are sound. But I’m still unsure whether the 25% figure includes all types of reused addresses or just the most obvious ones.

    Would appreciate a source for the Deloitte report - I can’t find it publicly.

  • Jon Visotzky

    Jon Visotzky

    December 27, 2025 AT 15:36

    So if I use a new address every time I send, I'm safe? What if someone sniffs the transaction before it's confirmed? Can they still do anything?

    Also why does everyone act like this is new? This has been a known issue since 2015

  • Isha Kaur

    Isha Kaur

    December 29, 2025 AT 11:35

    As someone from India, I’ve watched crypto adoption grow here rapidly, but awareness about quantum threats is practically nonexistent. Most people think blockchain = unbreakable. They don’t realize that the math behind it can be undone by a machine that doesn’t even exist yet.

    We need educational campaigns - in local languages, on WhatsApp, on YouTube Shorts. Not just Reddit threads. The real danger isn’t the quantum computer - it’s the silence around it. People are still sending Bitcoin to exchange addresses they reuse for months. That’s not ignorance. That’s negligence born of lack of access to clear information.

  • Tara Marshall

    Tara Marshall

    December 29, 2025 AT 22:18

    Move your coins. Don’t reuse addresses. That’s the whole thing.

    Done.

  • Nelson Issangya

    Nelson Issangya

    December 30, 2025 AT 02:34

    Look, I get it. This stuff is scary. But don’t let fear paralyze you. You’re not helpless. You have power. You can act. Right now. Today.

    Move your coins. Check your addresses. Use a hardware wallet. These aren’t just tips - they’re armor. And you deserve to be protected.

    Don’t wait for someone else to fix this. Fix it yourself. You’ve got this. 💪

  • Chris Jenny

    Chris Jenny

    December 30, 2025 AT 03:25

    THIS IS A GOVERNMENT STING OPERATION. THE NSA HAS BEEN USING QUANTUM COMPUTERS SINCE 2017 TO TRACK EVERY BITCOIN TRANSACTION. THEY’RE NOT GOING TO CRACK THEM - THEY’RE GOING TO USE THEM TO FRAME INNOCENT PEOPLE. YOU THINK YOU’RE SAFE? YOU’RE BEING WATCHED. YOUR WALLET IS A TRACKING DEVICE. THEY’RE WAITING TO SHUT DOWN THE ENTIRE SYSTEM AND BLAME IT ON ‘HACKERS.’

    THEY’RE USING THIS TO JUSTIFY DIGITAL CURRENCY CONTROL. DON’T BE FOOLED.

  • Uzoma Jenfrancis

    Uzoma Jenfrancis

    December 31, 2025 AT 01:39

    China is ahead. Russia is ahead. We’re still arguing about whether to move coins. This isn’t crypto. This is warfare. And we’re losing because we’re too busy arguing about memes to see the missile coming.

    Stop being lazy. Move your coins. Or don’t. But don’t cry when it’s gone.

  • Thomas Downey

    Thomas Downey

    January 1, 2026 AT 08:35

    One must question the intellectual integrity of those who reduce a fundamental shift in computational paradigms to a checklist of wallet migrations. The true vulnerability lies not in the cryptographic primitives themselves, but in the institutional inertia that has allowed obsolete standards to persist for over a decade. This is not a user error - it is a systemic failure of governance, foresight, and responsibility. To suggest that merely ‘moving coins’ resolves the issue is to mistake symptom for cause.

  • Manish Yadav

    Manish Yadav

    January 2, 2026 AT 07:01

    why people still use old wallet? so dumb. if you reuse address you are stupid. move your coins now. no excuse. quantum or not, you are asking for trouble. this is basic. like leaving your house key under the mat.

  • Krista Hewes

    Krista Hewes

    January 3, 2026 AT 14:39

    oh my god i just checked my wallet and i totally reused an address back in 2021… i didn’t even realize. i’m so embarrassed. i’m moving everything right now. thank you for posting this. i thought i was being careful but i guess i wasn’t. this is so scary but also kind of a relief to know what to do.

  • Mairead Stiùbhart

    Mairead Stiùbhart

    January 5, 2026 AT 04:16

    Oh wow, so now we’re all supposed to panic because someone said ‘quantum’? Brilliant. Let’s all sell our crypto and buy gold while we’re at it. Meanwhile, the real threat is still your ex-husband who knows your seed phrase.

    Move your coins? Sure. But also, maybe stop trusting strangers on the internet to tell you what to do with your money?

  • Neal Schechter

    Neal Schechter

    January 6, 2026 AT 23:43

    Actually, just saw a comment above saying ‘don’t trust strangers’ - and that’s the whole point. You don’t have to trust anyone. You just have to be smart. Check your own addresses. Use a blockchain explorer. It’s not hard. It’s not magic. It’s just… responsibility.

    Stop outsourcing your security. You’re the only one who holds the key.

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are
marked *