- December
20
2024 - 5
Bored Candy City Fee Calculator
| Exchange | Trading Fee | LP Reward | Buy-back / Treasury |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bored Candy City | 0.15% | 0.10% | 0.05% (CANDY buyback) |
| MMFinance | 0.17% | 0.10% | 0.05% (buyback) + 0.02% (protocol) |
| Typical Uniswap-V2 clone | 0.30% | 0.25% | 0.05% (unused) |
Enter trade values and click "Calculate Potential Savings"
TL;DR
- 0.15% trading fee - the lowest fee claimed on any blockchain.
- All fees are redistributed: 0.10% to liquidity providers, 0.05% to CANDY buybacks.
- Combines a standard AMM DEX with play‑to‑earn games and an NFT marketplace.
- Token price around $0.0015 (FDV $383k) with extremely low daily volume.
- User reports highlight payment issues and absent customer support, so proceed with caution.
When you hear the name Bored Candy City is a decentralized exchange (DEX) and automated market maker (AMM) built on the Cronos Chain, blending DeFi trading with play‑to‑earn gaming and an NFT marketplace. The platform promises the cheapest fee structure in crypto, a full‑fee‑return model, and a community‑first tokenomics design. But how does it stack up in practice? This review digs into the fee mechanics, token economics, gaming features, security track record, and real‑world user experiences so you can decide whether to trade, play, or stay away.
What Sets Bored Candy City Apart?
The most obvious differentiator is the Bored Candy City review headline claim: a 0.15% fee, half the industry norm. The fee split is transparent-0.10% rewards liquidity providers (LPs) and 0.05% funds CANDY token buybacks, creating what the team calls Protocol Owned Liquidity (POL). This model mirrors the early move by MMFinance on Cronos, but Bored Candy City pushes the fee lower and pledges to give 100% of revenue back to the community.
Beyond pure trading, the platform integrates a play‑to‑earn ecosystem. Users earn the native CANDY token by completing puzzle games similar to Candy Crush, competing in leaderboards, or trading NFTs on the built‑in marketplace. The NFT marketplace runs on a Diamond Structure architecture, allowing extensible features without sacrificing gas efficiency.
Fee Structure & Tokenomics in Detail
The fee architecture is simple on paper but impacts several participants:
- Traders pay 0.15% per swap.
- Liquidity Providers receive 0.10% back as reward, automatically added to the pool.
- Protocol Treasury allocates the remaining 0.05% to buy back CANDY tokens, reducing circulating supply and increasing the share of POL.
Because the buyback is permanent, the protocol claims a deflationary pressure on the token, theoretically supporting price. However, real market data tells a different story: as of August2025, CANDY trades around $0.0015 with a 24‑hour volume of just $54.3. The token’s max supply is 250million, but circulation numbers are vague, making it hard to evaluate scarcity.
Comparing fee models helps put the numbers in context:
| Exchange | Trading fee | LP reward | Buy‑back / treasury |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bored Candy City | 0.15% | 0.10% | 0.05% (CANDY buyback) |
| MMFinance | 0.17% | 0.10% | 0.05% (buyback) + 0.02% (protocol) |
| Typical Uniswap‑V2 clone | 0.30% | 0.25% | 0.05% (unused) |
Gaming & NFT Marketplace - How It Works
The gaming layer runs off the same smart contracts that power the DEX, using the UniswapV2 formula for swaps and a custom Diamond Structure for NFT minting, buying, and selling. Players earn CANDY by completing levels, hitting daily challenges, or climbing leaderboards. Referral links also generate a small token bonus, encouraging viral growth.
On the NFT side, creators can list artwork, in‑game skins, or collectible cards. Each sale contributes a 0.05% fee that is funneled back into the liquidity pool, keeping the market liquid for both traders and gamers.
While the concept is appealing, user reports on the iOS app (ID6444065135) reveal a gap between promise and delivery. Several reviewers claim they paid for in‑game candy and never received it, with no response from support channels. The lack of a visible help desk or ticket system raises red flags for anyone relying on the gaming rewards for income.
Security, Audits & Trustworthiness
Security is a major concern for any DeFi platform. Bored Candy City’s codebase reuses audited contracts from UniswapV2, which offers a solid foundation for the AMM portion. However, the custom Diamond Structure for NFTs and the gaming reward logic have not been publicly audited by a third‑party firm, according to the project’s website.
On-chain data shows minimal activity: CoinGecko reports 24‑hour trading volume of just $26.42, and Holder.io notes periods when CANDY isn’t listed on any major exchange. This thin liquidity makes price manipulation easier and increases slippage for traders.
Community sentiment is mixed. PitchBob.io’s analysis highlights the platform’s “true decentralization” ethos, but multiple technical reviewers point out the scarcity of real‑world usage and the absence of reliable customer support. In the crypto space, a strong support channel often separates a functional protocol from a scam‑prone project.
Pros and Cons - A Quick Reference
- Pros
- Industry‑lowest 0.15% trading fee.
- Full fee redistribution creates a community‑focused economy.
- Integrated gaming and NFT marketplace offers multiple earning paths.
- Built on familiar UniswapV2 architecture, easing onboarding for DeFi users.
- Cons
- Extremely low liquidity and trading volume; high slippage risk.
- Token price volatile with unclear circulating supply.
- No public security audit for gaming/NFT modules.
- User complaints about unpaid in‑game purchases and missing support.
- Limited presence on major price trackers and exchanges.
How to Get Started (Step‑by‑Step)
- Install a crypto wallet that supports Cronos (e.g., MetaMask with the Cronos network added).
- Acquire some CRO or an ERC‑20 token that you can bridge to Cronos.
- Visit the official site candycity.finance and click “Launch DEX”.
- Connect your wallet; you’ll see the AMM interface powered by UniswapV2.
- To provide liquidity, click “Add Liquidity”, choose a CANDY‑CRO pair, and approve the transaction.
- Start swapping, noting the 0.15% fee displayed at the bottom of the trade box.
- If you want to earn through gaming, download the iOS app from the App Store, create an account, and follow the tutorial to claim your first free CANDY reward.
- Monitor your LP rewards in the “Farm” tab; rewards accrue automatically and can be claimed at any time.
Because the platform’s liquidity is thin, keep trade sizes modest (under $500) until you gauge price impact. Also, consider using a hardware wallet for added security, especially when interacting with the NFT marketplace.
Final Takeaway & Next Steps
If you’re hunting for the absolute cheapest DEX fees on Cronos and you enjoy the idea of earning tokens through casual games, Bored Candy City offers a novel blend. However, the combination of low liquidity, vague token metrics, and documented user complaints suggests you should treat it as an experimental side‑project rather than a primary trading hub.
For a safer DeFi experience, you might start with MMFinance or a more established DEX like PancakeSwap on BSC, then allocate a small, discretionary amount to Bored Candy City to test the gaming rewards. Keep an eye on upcoming security audits-if the team publishes a reputable third‑party review, confidence could rise. Until then, limit exposure, stay alert to support response times, and always double‑check transaction details before confirming.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main advantage of Bored Candy City's 0.15% fee?
The fee is half of the typical 0.30% charged by most AMMs, meaning traders keep more of their capital and liquidity providers receive a higher net reward after the 0.05% buy‑back is taken.
How are CANDY token buybacks performed?
Each swap contributes 0.05% of the trade value, which is automatically swapped for CANDY on the DEX and sent to a treasury address that locks the tokens, effectively reducing circulating supply.
Is Bored Candy City safe for storing large amounts of crypto?
The AMM core uses audited UniswapV2 contracts, but the gaming and NFT modules lack independent audits. Combined with low liquidity, it’s best to keep only modest amounts on the platform and store the bulk in a hardware wallet.
Can I earn CANDY without trading?
Yes. The mobile app offers daily puzzles, leaderboard competitions, and referral bonuses that dispense CANDY directly to your wallet, though users have reported delays and missing payouts.
How does Bored Candy City compare to MMFinance?
Both platforms run on Cronos and use a fee‑redistribution model. Bored Candy City charges 0.15% versus MMFinance’s 0.17%, and it claims 100% of fees go back to the community. However, MMFinance enjoys higher liquidity and broader exchange listings, making it a safer choice for larger trades.
About Author
I'm a blockchain analyst and crypto writer focused on turning complex tokenomics into clear, actionable insights. I examine emerging protocols, exchange mechanics, and on-chain data to help readers navigate markets confidently. I also publish practical guides on airdrop strategies and security best practices.
View more post
John Corey Turner
December 20, 2024 AT 18:20The Bored Candy City (BCC) DEX presents a curious hybrid of low‑fee trading and gamified incentives.
The its 0.15% fee undercuts many mainstream AMMs, offering a visible cost advantage.
Yet the true intrigue lies in the layered reward structure, where traders earn both LP rewards and a modest buy‑back share.
Philosophically, this model echoes the concept of “fair exchange” where value circulates among participants.
By allocating 0.10% to LPs, BCC nurtures liquidity depth, a cornerstone for price stability.
The additional 0.05% earmarked for the candy treasury acts as a subtle fiscal policy, reminiscent of a central bank’s seigniorage.
One may argue that the gamified veneer masks a conventional fee‑rebate system, yet the tokenomics are transparently displayed.
In contrast, Uniswap‑V2 clones typically charge 0.30% and return a single pool of fees to liquidity providers.
The BCC design thus invites a more democratic redistribution of fees, lowering entry barriers for small traders.
Moreover, the on‑chain calculator embedded in the UI empowers users to project savings with simple arithmetic.
This transparency is rare in the otherwise opaque DeFi landscape, fostering trust through observable metrics.
Critics may decry the “candy” branding as frivolous, but the underlying economics remain sound.
The token’s modest inflation, funded by the buy‑back, aims to sustain a healthy circulating supply.
From a game‑theoretic standpoint, the incentive loop encourages both trading volume and liquidity provision.
Consequently, the ecosystem may experience a virtuous cycle of activity and reward.
In sum, Bored Candy City offers a low‑fee DEX that cleverly intertwines financial utility with playful mechanics, challenging the notion that serious finance must be dour.
Katherine Sparks
December 25, 2024 AT 22:20Dear readers, the analysis of BCC's fee structure is commendable; however, I must point out a few considerations.
The recommended approach is to examine the long‑term sustainability of the 0.05% buy‑back mechanism, which may impact token valuation.
Furthermore, the gamified aspects should not distract from rigorous risk assessment.
In conclusion, while the low fees are appealing, prudent investors ought to conduct thorough due diligence. :)
Kimberly Kempken
December 31, 2024 AT 02:20Bored Candy City is nothing but a marketing gimmick masquerading as a serious DEX.
The so‑called “gaming twist” is a shallow veneer designed to lure the easily impressed.
Low fees are meaningless if the underlying protocol is weak and over‑engineered for flash‑boys.
Don't be fooled by candy metaphors; this project is destined to fizzle once the hype subsides.
Eva Lee
January 5, 2025 AT 06:20The architecture employs a hybrid AMM model integrating fee‑splitting logic via smart contract orchestrators.
Liquidity providers are allocated a 0.10% LP reward, while the treasury allocation utilizes a deterministic split function.
Such a design leverages composability patterns and on‑chain governance hooks to facilitate dynamic parameter adjustments.
From a systems perspective, this reduces friction in capital efficiency while preserving fee arbitrage opportunities.
stephanie lauman
January 10, 2025 AT 10:20It is evident that the BCC initiative is part of a broader covert agenda orchestrated by hidden financiers.
The 0.05% buy‑back is a subtle redistribution mechanism that siphons value to undisclosed addresses.
Such practices are emblematic of the shadowy networks manipulating DeFi ecosystems for ulterior motives.
Stay vigilant; the candy coating conceals a deeper manipulation of market dynamics.
Twinkle Shop
January 15, 2025 AT 14:20From a cultural standpoint, the integration of playful aesthetics within a financial protocol reflects an evolving paradigm in digital economies.
The confluence of low‑fee trading and gamified incentives signals a shift towards inclusivity, inviting participants who might otherwise be alienated by austere interfaces.
Moreover, the tokenomics are articulated with a clear emphasis on community‑driven value capture, fostering a sense of collective ownership.
In this light, Bored Candy City can be perceived as a microcosm of the broader Web3 narrative, where utility and entertainment intersect to democratize access to sophisticated financial instruments.
Rob Watts
January 20, 2025 AT 18:20Low fees, high fun – that’s the sweet spot.
Bhagwat Sen
January 25, 2025 AT 22:20Listen, the UI is cluttered; you need to streamline the dashboard because users will bail if the experience feels chaotic.
Cathy Ruff
January 31, 2025 AT 02:20Honestly, this thing feels like a toy and not a serious DEX.
Amy Harrison
February 5, 2025 AT 06:20Love the low fees! 🎉🚀
Miranda Co
February 10, 2025 AT 10:20While it may look playful, the underlying mechanics are solid and can attract new users.
mukesh chy
February 15, 2025 AT 14:20Oh sure, because every project named after candy is obviously a scam.
Marc Addington
February 20, 2025 AT 18:20America needs home‑grown DEXs that don’t rely on foreign tokenomics; BCC is a step forward.
Amal Al.
February 25, 2025 AT 22:20Indeed, the fee‑allocation matrix is quite elegant; however, we must scrutinize the buy‑back mechanism-does it truly benefit the community?; moreover, transparency is key!
Natalie Rawley
March 3, 2025 AT 02:20I can’t believe they actually think this will change the market – pure hype!
Scott McReynolds
March 8, 2025 AT 06:20The gaming twist embedded in Bored Candy City could serve as a catalyst for broader DeFi adoption.
By rewarding user engagement with playful elements, the platform lowers the psychological barrier to entry.
This approach aligns with behavioral economics, where incentives shape participation patterns.
Low transaction fees further sweeten the proposition, making frequent micro‑trades viable.
When users see immediate, tangible rewards, network effects accelerate.
The token’s utility extends beyond pure speculation, fostering a community‑driven economy.
Such dynamics may attract both seasoned traders and newcomers seeking a low‑risk environment.
Moreover, the transparent fee calculator demystifies cost structures, enhancing user confidence.
In an ecosystem often plagued by opacity, this clarity is a competitive advantage.
From a security perspective, the smart contracts have undergone audits, mitigating common attack vectors.
Nevertheless, continuous monitoring remains essential to guard against emergent vulnerabilities.
The governance model, though nascent, promises participatory decision‑making for future upgrades.
As the platform matures, adaptive fee structures could respond to market conditions.
Overall, the synergy of low fees and gamified incentives positions BCC as a noteworthy experiment in the DeFi landscape.
Stakeholders should watch its evolution closely, as its success could inspire analogous innovations across the space.
Alex Gatti
March 13, 2025 AT 10:20Your optimism is contagious; the gaming twist could indeed broaden adoption.
Greer Pitts
March 18, 2025 AT 14:20i think the fee is realy low but the UI looks messy.
Lurline Wiese
March 23, 2025 AT 18:20Whoa, this feels like the wild west of DeFi!
Jenise Williams-Green
March 28, 2025 AT 22:20It is morally dubious to lure inexperienced users with candy‑themed gamification.
Kortney Williams
April 3, 2025 AT 02:20I see potential here; perhaps community feedback can refine the reward schedule.
Adarsh Menon
April 8, 2025 AT 06:20Sure, because more community input never leads to chaos.
Laurie Kathiari
April 13, 2025 AT 10:20One must consider the ethical implications of incentivizing speculative trades.
Jim Griffiths
April 18, 2025 AT 14:20Fee is low; tokenomics are transparent – good.
Matt Nguyen
April 23, 2025 AT 18:20When one scrutinizes the cryptographic underpinnings of BCC, one discerns a sophisticated layered governance model obscured by ostentatious candy branding.