SEC vs CFTC: Who Really Controls Crypto Regulation in the U.S.?

  • November

    25

    2025
  • 5
SEC vs CFTC: Who Really Controls Crypto Regulation in the U.S.?

The U.S. crypto market is stuck in a regulatory tug-of-war between two federal agencies that can’t agree on who’s in charge. The SEC says most cryptocurrencies are securities. The CFTC says they’re commodities. And businesses, investors, and developers are caught in the middle.

How It All Started

The split began in 2015, when the CFTC ruled that Bitcoin was a commodity under the Commodity Exchange Act. That meant they had authority over futures, options, and fraud in crypto markets. Just months later, the SEC started applying the 1946 Howey Test - a legal standard from a citrus grove case - to decide if a digital asset was a security. The test asks: Is someone investing money in a project expecting profits from others’ work? If yes, it’s a security. That’s where the fight started.

By 2018, a federal court backed the CFTC’s position in CFTC v. McDonnell, calling Bitcoin and Ethereum "goods" traded like commodities. But the SEC didn’t back down. They kept filing lawsuits against ICOs, exchanges, and token issuers, claiming their tokens were unregistered securities. The problem? There’s no clear line. Some tokens look like stocks. Others behave like digital gold. And regulators aren’t telling you which is which until after you get sued.

What Each Agency Actually Controls

The SEC’s power comes from the Securities Act of 1933 and the Exchange Act of 1934. They regulate stock exchanges, brokers, mutual funds, and anything that looks like an investment contract. That’s why they went after Coinbase in 2023, saying the exchange was operating as an unregistered securities exchange by listing tokens like Solana and Cardano. The SEC argues these tokens are sold with promises of future value - classic security behavior.

The CFTC, on the other hand, regulates derivatives markets. They oversee futures, swaps, and options. They don’t police every crypto trade - only those involving contracts that bet on price changes. But they also have anti-fraud powers over spot markets for commodities. That’s why they went after the founders of Terraform Labs and BitMEX for market manipulation. Their jurisdiction is narrower, but they’ve been more open to innovation. They approved Bitcoin futures in 2017. They approved Ether futures in 2023. And in April 2025, they approved spot Ethereum ETFs - something the SEC still hasn’t done.

Here’s the catch: the SEC doesn’t regulate spot markets for commodities. The CFTC doesn’t regulate securities. But crypto assets? They’re both. That’s why you get two agencies chasing the same company with different rules.

Who’s Winning? The Enforcement Numbers Tell the Story

Between 2017 and 2022, the SEC filed 32 enforcement actions against crypto firms. The CFTC filed 15. In 2023 alone, the SEC launched 23 cases - more than any year before. Most were for unregistered securities offerings or unregistered exchanges. The CFTC’s cases were mostly about fraud and manipulation in derivatives trading.

But enforcement doesn’t mean clarity. It means fear. Companies don’t know if they’re breaking the law until the SEC shows up with a subpoena. That’s why 81% of U.S. crypto firms delayed product launches in 2023, according to the Blockchain Association. The average cost to determine if a token is a security? $185,000 and six months of legal work. That’s not innovation - that’s insurance.

Even big players are stuck. Kraken and Gemini now follow both SEC and CFTC rules for every token they list. That doubles their compliance costs. One exchange executive told me they spend $2.7 million a year just to avoid getting sued - and half of that is because they’re trying to satisfy two conflicting regulators.

Two judges argue over Bitcoin and Ethereum in a courtroom, with tokens as nervous mice and a giant gavel hovering above.

The Big Shift in Early 2025

Everything changed in January 2025. Judge Katherine Polk Failla, who had previously ruled the SEC had a strong case against Coinbase, suddenly allowed Coinbase to appeal the case. Then, on February 27, the SEC dropped the lawsuit entirely. No explanation. No admission of error. Just a joint filing to dismiss.

It wasn’t random. Gary Gensler, the SEC chair who had been the most aggressive regulator in crypto history, was quietly sidelined. New leadership was taking over. And the CFTC? They moved fast. Within weeks, they approved the first spot Ethereum ETFs - a move the SEC had blocked for months. Meanwhile, the SEC delayed decisions on Bitcoin ETFs until August 2025.

This wasn’t just a legal twist. It was a signal. The SEC might be retreating from its all-out war on crypto. Or at least, they’re realizing that suing every project isn’t working. The market is moving. Institutional money is waiting. And the CFTC is offering a path forward - if you’re a commodity, not a security.

What’s Coming Next? The CLARITY Act and the Senate’s Response

In April 2024, the House passed the CLARITY Act - a bill that would finally draw a line. Under this law:

  • Digital assets that are decentralized, mature, and don’t give ownership rights (like Bitcoin and Ether) become "digital commodities" - regulated by the CFTC.
  • Everything else - tokens sold with promises of profit, especially new ones - stay under the SEC’s control as securities.

The Senate hasn’t passed anything yet. But their draft proposal, released in March 2024, suggests a similar split. The big difference? The Senate wants a formal "digital asset determination" process before any token launches. That means projects would have to get approval from either the SEC or CFTC before going live.

Both sides are working on legislation. But the CFTC, backed by the Senate Agriculture Committee, has more political momentum. The SEC, tied to the Senate Banking Committee, is losing ground. Experts at the Bipartisan Policy Center give a 68% chance that a compromise bill passes by the end of 2025.

Crypto startups stand at a crossroads: one path leads to a bright market labeled CFTC, the other to a dark maze labeled SEC.

Why This Matters for You

If you’re an investor: You’re not just betting on price. You’re betting on regulation. Bitcoin and Ether are safer bets now because they’re likely to stay under CFTC oversight. Newer tokens? They’re still in the SEC’s crosshairs.

If you’re a developer: Don’t launch a token without legal advice. The difference between a commodity and a security isn’t about technology - it’s about how you market it. If you say "investors will profit," you’re probably a security. If you say "this is digital cash," you’re probably a commodity.

If you’re a business: You can’t afford to wait. The cost of compliance is rising. The risk of enforcement is real. And the U.S. is losing ground. While the EU launched MiCA - a single, clear crypto rulebook - in June 2024, the U.S. is still arguing over who gets to write the rules. The Boston Consulting Group says U.S. crypto firms captured just 14% of global crypto volume in 2024 - down from 32% in 2020. That’s not because the tech is worse. It’s because the rules are a mess.

The Global Picture

The U.S. isn’t the only player. The EU has MiCA. Singapore has clear licensing. Japan has a crypto licensing system. Even Switzerland has a crypto-friendly legal framework. But the U.S. - the birthplace of Bitcoin and home to most of the world’s top crypto firms - is paralyzed by internal conflict.

And it’s costing billions. The Center for Strategic and International Studies estimates that if the U.S. doesn’t fix this by 2027, it could lose $500 billion in potential investment. That’s not just about Coinbase or Binance. It’s about venture capital, pension funds, banks, and everyday people who want to invest in the next generation of finance.

Right now, the CFTC is offering stability. The SEC is offering uncertainty. The market is voting with its feet - and it’s choosing clarity over control.

Is Bitcoin a security or a commodity?

Bitcoin is widely considered a commodity under U.S. law. Both the CFTC and federal courts have ruled that Bitcoin fits the definition of a commodity under the Commodity Exchange Act. The SEC has never claimed Bitcoin is a security, and in practice, it treats Bitcoin like a digital asset outside its securities jurisdiction.

Why does the SEC care about crypto if it’s not a security?

The SEC doesn’t regulate Bitcoin or Ether directly. But it does regulate platforms that trade them - especially if those platforms offer trading pairs with tokens the SEC believes are securities. For example, if a platform lists Solana alongside a token the SEC says is a security, the SEC may argue the platform is acting as an unregistered exchange. That’s why Coinbase got sued - not because it traded Bitcoin, but because it traded tokens the SEC claimed were securities.

Can a crypto asset be both a security and a commodity?

Legally, no - but practically, yes. The same token can be sold as a security in an initial offering, then later trade as a commodity on an exchange. The Howey Test applies to how the asset is offered, not how it’s used. Ethereum, for example, was sold as a security in its 2014 ICO. But now, after becoming decentralized, the CFTC and courts treat it as a commodity. The SEC hasn’t changed its view, but it’s stopped targeting Ethereum directly.

What happens if I trade crypto on a U.S. exchange?

If you trade Bitcoin or Ether on a regulated exchange like Coinbase or Kraken, you’re likely fine. Those platforms now treat them as commodities under CFTC rules. But if you trade newer tokens - especially those with names like "StakingCoin" or "ProfitToken" - you might be trading something the SEC considers a security. If the exchange gets shut down, your access could disappear overnight. Always check if a token has been flagged by the SEC.

Will the U.S. ever have clear crypto rules?

Yes - but not yet. The House-passed CLARITY Act offers a clear path: CFTC for Bitcoin and Ether, SEC for new tokens sold as investments. The Senate is working on a similar version. If passed by late 2025, it will end the current chaos. Until then, expect more lawsuits, more delays, and more companies moving overseas.

What You Should Do Now

If you’re holding crypto: Don’t panic. Bitcoin and Ethereum are safe. Avoid tokens that promise returns, staking rewards, or profit-sharing - those are the ones the SEC is targeting.

If you’re building a crypto project: Get legal advice early. Don’t wait for a lawsuit. Use the CLARITY Act criteria as a guide: Is it decentralized? Is it used as a medium of exchange? Does it give ownership rights? If yes to the first two, it’s likely a commodity.

If you’re an investor or trader: Stick to platforms that clearly label which assets are commodities and which are securities. Avoid exchanges that list hundreds of unknown tokens. The safer ones are already adapting to the coming rules.

The war between the SEC and CFTC isn’t over. But the tide is turning. Clarity is coming. And the winners won’t be the ones who fought the hardest - they’ll be the ones who waited for the rules to be written.

Similar News

12 Comments

  • Tina Detelj

    Tina Detelj

    November 25, 2025 AT 19:49

    So we’re telling me the SEC’s entire crypto strategy is just… a 1946 citrus lawsuit stretched over a blockchain? I mean, it’s like trying to fit a quantum computer into a typewriter and then blaming the machine for not writing poetry. The CFTC’s been quietly building a bridge while the SEC’s out here throwing flamethrowers at every ICO like it’s a haunted house at Halloween. Who’s the real villain here? The regulators… or the fact that we’re still using 1930s laws to govern 2025 tech??

  • Wilma Inmenzo

    Wilma Inmenzo

    November 27, 2025 AT 03:46

    THEY’RE ALL IN ON IT. The SEC’s being pushed out because they were about to expose the real truth: crypto was never meant to be regulated-it was meant to be OWNED. And now the CFTC? They’re just the new face of the same casino. You think they’re ‘pro-innovation’? They approved ETH futures in 2023? That’s not innovation-that’s a hedge fund’s wet dream. They’re not letting you in-they’re letting you bet on the game they already rigged. Watch. The next ‘spot ETF’ will be a paper trail to Wall Street’s offshore accounts. I TOLD YOU.

  • priyanka subbaraj

    priyanka subbaraj

    November 28, 2025 AT 18:31

    Let me just say this: the SEC’s lawsuit against Coinbase wasn’t about securities. It was about power. And now that they’ve collapsed? It’s not a win. It’s a confession. The entire U.S. regulatory system is a house of cards made of legal jargon and corporate bribes. And we’re all just watching it burn while they sip champagne in D.C.

  • George Kakosouris

    George Kakosouris

    November 29, 2025 AT 00:58

    Let’s be real-the CFTC’s ‘commodity’ label is just a regulatory arbitrage play. They’re not ‘pro-innovation,’ they’re pro-liquidity. Spot ETH ETFs? That’s just institutional money laundering with a blockchain veneer. The SEC’s aggression was messy, yes, but at least it was consistent. The CFTC’s ‘clarity’ is just a backdoor for quant funds to front-run retail. And don’t get me started on the CLARITY Act-it’s a Trojan horse for centralized control under a decentralized label. The market’s voting? Nah. The market’s being herded.

  • Felicia Sue Lynn

    Felicia Sue Lynn

    November 29, 2025 AT 20:56

    There’s a quiet dignity in how this conflict has unfolded-not as a battle of power, but as a reflection of deeper philosophical divides. The SEC sees crypto through the lens of investor protection, rooted in the trauma of 1929. The CFTC sees it as a new market mechanism, evolving like futures did in Chicago in the 1800s. Perhaps the real question isn’t who’s right, but whether we’re willing to build a new framework instead of forcing old ones into new shapes. The CLARITY Act might be the first step toward that maturity-not because it’s perfect, but because it acknowledges complexity.

  • Christina Oneviane

    Christina Oneviane

    November 30, 2025 AT 16:21

    Oh wow, the SEC ‘quietly sidelined’? Like, they just got a memo saying ‘hey, stop being evil’? And now the CFTC’s the hero? Please. Gary Gensler didn’t get sidelined-he got fired. Because the whole SEC was a PR stunt to scare people into thinking the government ‘cares.’ Now they’ve got a new script: ‘We’re chill, we’re pro-crypto, we’re not the bad guys.’ Yeah, right. The same people who sued Kraken for listing ETH are now patting themselves on the back for approving ETH ETFs? That’s not leadership. That’s a corporate rebrand. And we’re supposed to be impressed?

  • Tom MacDermott

    Tom MacDermott

    December 1, 2025 AT 01:52

    Everyone’s acting like this is a breakthrough. It’s not. The CFTC’s ‘clarity’ is just the SEC’s playbook with a different label. Spot ETH ETFs? That’s not innovation-it’s Wall Street finally getting the green light to pump and dump on a bigger scale. And the CLARITY Act? A joke. Decentralized? Mature? Who decides that? A committee of ex-SEC lawyers? This isn’t regulation. It’s a corporate tax shelter with a blockchain sticker on it. And you’re all celebrating like it’s Christmas? Pathetic.

  • Susan Dugan

    Susan Dugan

    December 2, 2025 AT 12:02

    Okay, real talk: if you’re holding Bitcoin or Ether right now, you’re not just holding crypto-you’re holding hope. Hope that the U.S. won’t kill its own innovation. The CFTC’s move isn’t perfect, but it’s the first real sign that maybe-just maybe-we’re not all going to be forced to move to Switzerland or Singapore. And to devs? Don’t wait for Congress. Build anyway. The rules will catch up. The market already did. I’ve seen startups in basements in Texas outpace VC-backed giants because they just shipped. That’s the real story here-not the lawyers, not the ETFs. It’s the builders who refused to wait.

  • SARE Homes

    SARE Homes

    December 3, 2025 AT 06:36

    Ugh. The SEC is the ONLY thing keeping this whole thing from being a complete joke. You think the CFTC is ‘pro-innovation’? They approved ETH futures in 2023? That’s not innovation-that’s a casino license. And now they’re giving spot ETFs? So what? Now hedge funds can short it, pump it, and crash it with zero accountability. And you call that progress? This isn’t regulation. It’s surrender. And you people are clapping like it’s a concert? I’m done.

  • Sam Daily

    Sam Daily

    December 3, 2025 AT 17:16

    Hey everyone-just wanted to say, if you’re stressed about this mess, breathe. The CFTC isn’t perfect, but they’re trying. And honestly? The fact that the SEC dropped the Coinbase case without explanation? That’s a win. It means the courts are starting to say, ‘Enough.’ I’ve been in crypto since 2017, and this is the first time I’ve felt like we’re not just fighting regulators-we’re shaping them. Keep building. Keep learning. And if you’re new? Don’t panic. Bitcoin and ETH are still safe. The rest? Do your homework. You got this 💪

  • Kristi Malicsi

    Kristi Malicsi

    December 4, 2025 AT 18:26

    SEC vs CFTC is just two old men arguing over who gets to hold the remote while the whole house is on fire

  • Rachel Thomas

    Rachel Thomas

    December 6, 2025 AT 08:23

    Wait so Bitcoin is a commodity now? So I can use it to buy a sandwich? No? Then why are we even talking about this? The whole thing is a scam. Everyone knows crypto is just digital gold. Why do we need two agencies? One says it’s a security, one says it’s a commodity, and the rest of us just want to trade without getting sued. Just let us trade. Why is this so hard?

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are
marked *