SEC vs CFTC: Who Really Controls Crypto Regulation in the U.S.?

  • November

    25

    2025
  • 5
SEC vs CFTC: Who Really Controls Crypto Regulation in the U.S.?

The U.S. crypto market is stuck in a regulatory tug-of-war between two federal agencies that can’t agree on who’s in charge. The SEC says most cryptocurrencies are securities. The CFTC says they’re commodities. And businesses, investors, and developers are caught in the middle.

How It All Started

The split began in 2015, when the CFTC ruled that Bitcoin was a commodity under the Commodity Exchange Act. That meant they had authority over futures, options, and fraud in crypto markets. Just months later, the SEC started applying the 1946 Howey Test - a legal standard from a citrus grove case - to decide if a digital asset was a security. The test asks: Is someone investing money in a project expecting profits from others’ work? If yes, it’s a security. That’s where the fight started.

By 2018, a federal court backed the CFTC’s position in CFTC v. McDonnell, calling Bitcoin and Ethereum "goods" traded like commodities. But the SEC didn’t back down. They kept filing lawsuits against ICOs, exchanges, and token issuers, claiming their tokens were unregistered securities. The problem? There’s no clear line. Some tokens look like stocks. Others behave like digital gold. And regulators aren’t telling you which is which until after you get sued.

What Each Agency Actually Controls

The SEC’s power comes from the Securities Act of 1933 and the Exchange Act of 1934. They regulate stock exchanges, brokers, mutual funds, and anything that looks like an investment contract. That’s why they went after Coinbase in 2023, saying the exchange was operating as an unregistered securities exchange by listing tokens like Solana and Cardano. The SEC argues these tokens are sold with promises of future value - classic security behavior.

The CFTC, on the other hand, regulates derivatives markets. They oversee futures, swaps, and options. They don’t police every crypto trade - only those involving contracts that bet on price changes. But they also have anti-fraud powers over spot markets for commodities. That’s why they went after the founders of Terraform Labs and BitMEX for market manipulation. Their jurisdiction is narrower, but they’ve been more open to innovation. They approved Bitcoin futures in 2017. They approved Ether futures in 2023. And in April 2025, they approved spot Ethereum ETFs - something the SEC still hasn’t done.

Here’s the catch: the SEC doesn’t regulate spot markets for commodities. The CFTC doesn’t regulate securities. But crypto assets? They’re both. That’s why you get two agencies chasing the same company with different rules.

Who’s Winning? The Enforcement Numbers Tell the Story

Between 2017 and 2022, the SEC filed 32 enforcement actions against crypto firms. The CFTC filed 15. In 2023 alone, the SEC launched 23 cases - more than any year before. Most were for unregistered securities offerings or unregistered exchanges. The CFTC’s cases were mostly about fraud and manipulation in derivatives trading.

But enforcement doesn’t mean clarity. It means fear. Companies don’t know if they’re breaking the law until the SEC shows up with a subpoena. That’s why 81% of U.S. crypto firms delayed product launches in 2023, according to the Blockchain Association. The average cost to determine if a token is a security? $185,000 and six months of legal work. That’s not innovation - that’s insurance.

Even big players are stuck. Kraken and Gemini now follow both SEC and CFTC rules for every token they list. That doubles their compliance costs. One exchange executive told me they spend $2.7 million a year just to avoid getting sued - and half of that is because they’re trying to satisfy two conflicting regulators.

Two judges argue over Bitcoin and Ethereum in a courtroom, with tokens as nervous mice and a giant gavel hovering above.

The Big Shift in Early 2025

Everything changed in January 2025. Judge Katherine Polk Failla, who had previously ruled the SEC had a strong case against Coinbase, suddenly allowed Coinbase to appeal the case. Then, on February 27, the SEC dropped the lawsuit entirely. No explanation. No admission of error. Just a joint filing to dismiss.

It wasn’t random. Gary Gensler, the SEC chair who had been the most aggressive regulator in crypto history, was quietly sidelined. New leadership was taking over. And the CFTC? They moved fast. Within weeks, they approved the first spot Ethereum ETFs - a move the SEC had blocked for months. Meanwhile, the SEC delayed decisions on Bitcoin ETFs until August 2025.

This wasn’t just a legal twist. It was a signal. The SEC might be retreating from its all-out war on crypto. Or at least, they’re realizing that suing every project isn’t working. The market is moving. Institutional money is waiting. And the CFTC is offering a path forward - if you’re a commodity, not a security.

What’s Coming Next? The CLARITY Act and the Senate’s Response

In April 2024, the House passed the CLARITY Act - a bill that would finally draw a line. Under this law:

  • Digital assets that are decentralized, mature, and don’t give ownership rights (like Bitcoin and Ether) become "digital commodities" - regulated by the CFTC.
  • Everything else - tokens sold with promises of profit, especially new ones - stay under the SEC’s control as securities.

The Senate hasn’t passed anything yet. But their draft proposal, released in March 2024, suggests a similar split. The big difference? The Senate wants a formal "digital asset determination" process before any token launches. That means projects would have to get approval from either the SEC or CFTC before going live.

Both sides are working on legislation. But the CFTC, backed by the Senate Agriculture Committee, has more political momentum. The SEC, tied to the Senate Banking Committee, is losing ground. Experts at the Bipartisan Policy Center give a 68% chance that a compromise bill passes by the end of 2025.

Crypto startups stand at a crossroads: one path leads to a bright market labeled CFTC, the other to a dark maze labeled SEC.

Why This Matters for You

If you’re an investor: You’re not just betting on price. You’re betting on regulation. Bitcoin and Ether are safer bets now because they’re likely to stay under CFTC oversight. Newer tokens? They’re still in the SEC’s crosshairs.

If you’re a developer: Don’t launch a token without legal advice. The difference between a commodity and a security isn’t about technology - it’s about how you market it. If you say "investors will profit," you’re probably a security. If you say "this is digital cash," you’re probably a commodity.

If you’re a business: You can’t afford to wait. The cost of compliance is rising. The risk of enforcement is real. And the U.S. is losing ground. While the EU launched MiCA - a single, clear crypto rulebook - in June 2024, the U.S. is still arguing over who gets to write the rules. The Boston Consulting Group says U.S. crypto firms captured just 14% of global crypto volume in 2024 - down from 32% in 2020. That’s not because the tech is worse. It’s because the rules are a mess.

The Global Picture

The U.S. isn’t the only player. The EU has MiCA. Singapore has clear licensing. Japan has a crypto licensing system. Even Switzerland has a crypto-friendly legal framework. But the U.S. - the birthplace of Bitcoin and home to most of the world’s top crypto firms - is paralyzed by internal conflict.

And it’s costing billions. The Center for Strategic and International Studies estimates that if the U.S. doesn’t fix this by 2027, it could lose $500 billion in potential investment. That’s not just about Coinbase or Binance. It’s about venture capital, pension funds, banks, and everyday people who want to invest in the next generation of finance.

Right now, the CFTC is offering stability. The SEC is offering uncertainty. The market is voting with its feet - and it’s choosing clarity over control.

Is Bitcoin a security or a commodity?

Bitcoin is widely considered a commodity under U.S. law. Both the CFTC and federal courts have ruled that Bitcoin fits the definition of a commodity under the Commodity Exchange Act. The SEC has never claimed Bitcoin is a security, and in practice, it treats Bitcoin like a digital asset outside its securities jurisdiction.

Why does the SEC care about crypto if it’s not a security?

The SEC doesn’t regulate Bitcoin or Ether directly. But it does regulate platforms that trade them - especially if those platforms offer trading pairs with tokens the SEC believes are securities. For example, if a platform lists Solana alongside a token the SEC says is a security, the SEC may argue the platform is acting as an unregistered exchange. That’s why Coinbase got sued - not because it traded Bitcoin, but because it traded tokens the SEC claimed were securities.

Can a crypto asset be both a security and a commodity?

Legally, no - but practically, yes. The same token can be sold as a security in an initial offering, then later trade as a commodity on an exchange. The Howey Test applies to how the asset is offered, not how it’s used. Ethereum, for example, was sold as a security in its 2014 ICO. But now, after becoming decentralized, the CFTC and courts treat it as a commodity. The SEC hasn’t changed its view, but it’s stopped targeting Ethereum directly.

What happens if I trade crypto on a U.S. exchange?

If you trade Bitcoin or Ether on a regulated exchange like Coinbase or Kraken, you’re likely fine. Those platforms now treat them as commodities under CFTC rules. But if you trade newer tokens - especially those with names like "StakingCoin" or "ProfitToken" - you might be trading something the SEC considers a security. If the exchange gets shut down, your access could disappear overnight. Always check if a token has been flagged by the SEC.

Will the U.S. ever have clear crypto rules?

Yes - but not yet. The House-passed CLARITY Act offers a clear path: CFTC for Bitcoin and Ether, SEC for new tokens sold as investments. The Senate is working on a similar version. If passed by late 2025, it will end the current chaos. Until then, expect more lawsuits, more delays, and more companies moving overseas.

What You Should Do Now

If you’re holding crypto: Don’t panic. Bitcoin and Ethereum are safe. Avoid tokens that promise returns, staking rewards, or profit-sharing - those are the ones the SEC is targeting.

If you’re building a crypto project: Get legal advice early. Don’t wait for a lawsuit. Use the CLARITY Act criteria as a guide: Is it decentralized? Is it used as a medium of exchange? Does it give ownership rights? If yes to the first two, it’s likely a commodity.

If you’re an investor or trader: Stick to platforms that clearly label which assets are commodities and which are securities. Avoid exchanges that list hundreds of unknown tokens. The safer ones are already adapting to the coming rules.

The war between the SEC and CFTC isn’t over. But the tide is turning. Clarity is coming. And the winners won’t be the ones who fought the hardest - they’ll be the ones who waited for the rules to be written.

Similar News

32 Comments

  • Tina Detelj

    Tina Detelj

    November 25, 2025 AT 17:49

    So we’re telling me the SEC’s entire crypto strategy is just… a 1946 citrus lawsuit stretched over a blockchain? I mean, it’s like trying to fit a quantum computer into a typewriter and then blaming the machine for not writing poetry. The CFTC’s been quietly building a bridge while the SEC’s out here throwing flamethrowers at every ICO like it’s a haunted house at Halloween. Who’s the real villain here? The regulators… or the fact that we’re still using 1930s laws to govern 2025 tech??

  • Wilma Inmenzo

    Wilma Inmenzo

    November 27, 2025 AT 01:46

    THEY’RE ALL IN ON IT. The SEC’s being pushed out because they were about to expose the real truth: crypto was never meant to be regulated-it was meant to be OWNED. And now the CFTC? They’re just the new face of the same casino. You think they’re ‘pro-innovation’? They approved ETH futures in 2023? That’s not innovation-that’s a hedge fund’s wet dream. They’re not letting you in-they’re letting you bet on the game they already rigged. Watch. The next ‘spot ETF’ will be a paper trail to Wall Street’s offshore accounts. I TOLD YOU.

  • priyanka subbaraj

    priyanka subbaraj

    November 28, 2025 AT 16:31

    Let me just say this: the SEC’s lawsuit against Coinbase wasn’t about securities. It was about power. And now that they’ve collapsed? It’s not a win. It’s a confession. The entire U.S. regulatory system is a house of cards made of legal jargon and corporate bribes. And we’re all just watching it burn while they sip champagne in D.C.

  • George Kakosouris

    George Kakosouris

    November 28, 2025 AT 22:58

    Let’s be real-the CFTC’s ‘commodity’ label is just a regulatory arbitrage play. They’re not ‘pro-innovation,’ they’re pro-liquidity. Spot ETH ETFs? That’s just institutional money laundering with a blockchain veneer. The SEC’s aggression was messy, yes, but at least it was consistent. The CFTC’s ‘clarity’ is just a backdoor for quant funds to front-run retail. And don’t get me started on the CLARITY Act-it’s a Trojan horse for centralized control under a decentralized label. The market’s voting? Nah. The market’s being herded.

  • Felicia Sue Lynn

    Felicia Sue Lynn

    November 29, 2025 AT 18:56

    There’s a quiet dignity in how this conflict has unfolded-not as a battle of power, but as a reflection of deeper philosophical divides. The SEC sees crypto through the lens of investor protection, rooted in the trauma of 1929. The CFTC sees it as a new market mechanism, evolving like futures did in Chicago in the 1800s. Perhaps the real question isn’t who’s right, but whether we’re willing to build a new framework instead of forcing old ones into new shapes. The CLARITY Act might be the first step toward that maturity-not because it’s perfect, but because it acknowledges complexity.

  • Christina Oneviane

    Christina Oneviane

    November 30, 2025 AT 14:21

    Oh wow, the SEC ‘quietly sidelined’? Like, they just got a memo saying ‘hey, stop being evil’? And now the CFTC’s the hero? Please. Gary Gensler didn’t get sidelined-he got fired. Because the whole SEC was a PR stunt to scare people into thinking the government ‘cares.’ Now they’ve got a new script: ‘We’re chill, we’re pro-crypto, we’re not the bad guys.’ Yeah, right. The same people who sued Kraken for listing ETH are now patting themselves on the back for approving ETH ETFs? That’s not leadership. That’s a corporate rebrand. And we’re supposed to be impressed?

  • Tom MacDermott

    Tom MacDermott

    November 30, 2025 AT 23:52

    Everyone’s acting like this is a breakthrough. It’s not. The CFTC’s ‘clarity’ is just the SEC’s playbook with a different label. Spot ETH ETFs? That’s not innovation-it’s Wall Street finally getting the green light to pump and dump on a bigger scale. And the CLARITY Act? A joke. Decentralized? Mature? Who decides that? A committee of ex-SEC lawyers? This isn’t regulation. It’s a corporate tax shelter with a blockchain sticker on it. And you’re all celebrating like it’s Christmas? Pathetic.

  • Susan Dugan

    Susan Dugan

    December 2, 2025 AT 10:02

    Okay, real talk: if you’re holding Bitcoin or Ether right now, you’re not just holding crypto-you’re holding hope. Hope that the U.S. won’t kill its own innovation. The CFTC’s move isn’t perfect, but it’s the first real sign that maybe-just maybe-we’re not all going to be forced to move to Switzerland or Singapore. And to devs? Don’t wait for Congress. Build anyway. The rules will catch up. The market already did. I’ve seen startups in basements in Texas outpace VC-backed giants because they just shipped. That’s the real story here-not the lawyers, not the ETFs. It’s the builders who refused to wait.

  • SARE Homes

    SARE Homes

    December 3, 2025 AT 04:36

    Ugh. The SEC is the ONLY thing keeping this whole thing from being a complete joke. You think the CFTC is ‘pro-innovation’? They approved ETH futures in 2023? That’s not innovation-that’s a casino license. And now they’re giving spot ETFs? So what? Now hedge funds can short it, pump it, and crash it with zero accountability. And you call that progress? This isn’t regulation. It’s surrender. And you people are clapping like it’s a concert? I’m done.

  • Sam Daily

    Sam Daily

    December 3, 2025 AT 15:16

    Hey everyone-just wanted to say, if you’re stressed about this mess, breathe. The CFTC isn’t perfect, but they’re trying. And honestly? The fact that the SEC dropped the Coinbase case without explanation? That’s a win. It means the courts are starting to say, ‘Enough.’ I’ve been in crypto since 2017, and this is the first time I’ve felt like we’re not just fighting regulators-we’re shaping them. Keep building. Keep learning. And if you’re new? Don’t panic. Bitcoin and ETH are still safe. The rest? Do your homework. You got this 💪

  • Kristi Malicsi

    Kristi Malicsi

    December 4, 2025 AT 16:26

    SEC vs CFTC is just two old men arguing over who gets to hold the remote while the whole house is on fire

  • Rachel Thomas

    Rachel Thomas

    December 6, 2025 AT 06:23

    Wait so Bitcoin is a commodity now? So I can use it to buy a sandwich? No? Then why are we even talking about this? The whole thing is a scam. Everyone knows crypto is just digital gold. Why do we need two agencies? One says it’s a security, one says it’s a commodity, and the rest of us just want to trade without getting sued. Just let us trade. Why is this so hard?

  • Tony spart

    Tony spart

    December 7, 2025 AT 15:34

    Look, I don’t care if it’s a security or a commodity. What I care about is that the U.S. is letting a bunch of foreign tech bros and Indian coders run the show while our own regulators sit around like they’re on vacation. The SEC’s a mess? Fine. But the CFTC? They’re just letting China and the EU win. We built Bitcoin. Now we’re letting it get stolen by foreigners because our government can’t make up its mind. This isn’t regulation. This is national surrender.

  • Mark Adelmann

    Mark Adelmann

    December 8, 2025 AT 19:03

    Hey, I just want to say-this whole thing is actually kind of beautiful. Two agencies, two philosophies, one messy, beautiful mess of democracy in action. The SEC wants to protect. The CFTC wants to enable. Neither is perfect. But together? They’re forcing us to think harder about what we really want from crypto. Is it freedom? Is it safety? Is it profit? Maybe the answer isn’t one agency. Maybe it’s both. And maybe that’s okay. We don’t need a single ruler. We need a system that lets us choose.

  • ola frank

    ola frank

    December 8, 2025 AT 19:53

    The regulatory bifurcation is structurally inevitable given the ontological ambiguity of digital assets. The Howey Test is a fiduciary framework designed for capital formation, whereas the Commodity Exchange Act governs price discovery mechanisms. The CFTC’s jurisdictional expansion into spot markets via anti-fraud authority is a legal innovation, but it creates a jurisdictional overlap that violates the principle of non-contradiction in regulatory taxonomy. The CLARITY Act attempts to resolve this via a maturity-based taxonomy, but fails to address the dynamic nature of decentralization-particularly the emergent properties of proof-of-stake networks. Until we formalize a functional classification system based on network behavior rather than intent, we’re merely rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.

  • imoleayo adebiyi

    imoleayo adebiyi

    December 8, 2025 AT 22:49

    This is the first time I’ve felt hopeful about crypto in the U.S. I’m from Nigeria, where we’ve had to build our own crypto ecosystem because the government didn’t care. But seeing the U.S. finally move toward clarity? It gives me faith that maybe, just maybe, the system can change. Not because of politics. But because people got tired of waiting. Keep pushing. Keep building. The world is watching.

  • Angel RYAN

    Angel RYAN

    December 9, 2025 AT 23:16

    Let’s just agree that no one has all the answers. The SEC’s too cautious. The CFTC’s too loose. The market’s moving faster than both. Maybe the best thing we can do is stop fighting over who’s in charge and start asking: what do we want crypto to be? Not what the lawyers say. Not what the politicians want. What do *we* want? That’s the only question that matters.

  • stephen bullard

    stephen bullard

    December 11, 2025 AT 10:06

    I’ve been in this space since 2013. I’ve seen bubbles, bans, bankruptcies, and breakthroughs. And right now? I feel something I haven’t felt in years: possibility. The SEC’s retreat isn’t weakness-it’s exhaustion. The CFTC’s move isn’t perfect, but it’s a door opening. And you know what? Doors don’t open forever. If you’ve got an idea, build it. If you’ve got capital, invest wisely. If you’re just watching? Get off the sidelines. This isn’t the end of the war. It’s the beginning of a new chapter. And I’m here for it.

  • SHASHI SHEKHAR

    SHASHI SHEKHAR

    December 13, 2025 AT 02:14

    Bro, let me break it down for you. The SEC is like your strict dad who says no to everything because he’s scared you’ll get hurt. The CFTC is your cool uncle who says ‘go ahead, but don’t break the car.’ Now the car is crypto. And guess what? The kids (the devs, the traders, the users) are already driving it. The dad is crying. The uncle is handing out helmets. And the car? It’s already at 200 mph. So who’s right? The uncle. Because the dad can’t stop the car. He can only try to slow it down. And that’s not leadership. That’s fear. And fear doesn’t build empires. Innovation does. So stop arguing. Start building. 🚀

  • Vaibhav Jaiswal

    Vaibhav Jaiswal

    December 14, 2025 AT 08:10

    Man… I’ve watched this whole thing unfold like a Netflix series. First season: SEC vs Everyone. Second season: CFTC sneaks in with ETFs. Third season? The CLARITY Act drops like a plot twist. And the finale? We all just shrug and say ‘well, at least it’s not worse.’ Honestly? I’m just glad we’re talking about it. The real win isn’t who wins the war. It’s that we finally stopped pretending this wasn’t a mess.

  • Abby cant tell ya

    Abby cant tell ya

    December 14, 2025 AT 23:04

    Oh my god, the SEC dropped the case? So now we’re supposed to be happy? That’s like a bully letting go of your lunch money… and then giving you a coupon for a different sandwich. I’m not impressed. I’m just tired. And honestly? I think the whole thing was a distraction. While we were arguing about who regulates crypto, they were quietly selling our data, our taxes, our privacy to the highest bidder. This isn’t about regulation. It’s about control. And they’re still in control.

  • Janice Jose

    Janice Jose

    December 16, 2025 AT 00:10

    It’s funny how everyone’s acting like this is a big win. But if you really think about it… the CFTC’s ‘clarity’ is just the SEC’s rules with a different name. They’re still deciding what’s legal. They’re still deciding who gets to play. The only difference? Now the rules are written by a different group of people. And I’m not sure that’s better. Just… different.

  • Savan Prajapati

    Savan Prajapati

    December 16, 2025 AT 09:33

    Bitcoin is commodity. Ethereum is commodity. Everything else? Risk. Stop overcomplicating. Just label it. If it’s not Bitcoin or Ether, assume it’s a security. End of story.

  • Michael Labelle

    Michael Labelle

    December 16, 2025 AT 19:25

    I’ve been watching this for years. I don’t have a dog in this fight. But I do know this: the people who win aren’t the ones who scream the loudest. They’re the ones who keep building quietly. The ones who don’t wait for permission. The ones who code, ship, and move on. That’s the real story here. Not the lawsuits. Not the ETFs. The builders.

  • Joel Christian

    Joel Christian

    December 17, 2025 AT 20:39

    so the sec just… gave up? like… did they run out of coffee or what? i mean i get it, they’ve been chasing shadows for 8 years, but now the cftc is the hero? come on. this is just a power play. someone in the white house told them to chill. and now we’re supposed to believe this is ‘clarity’? lol. i’m out.

  • jeff aza

    jeff aza

    December 19, 2025 AT 11:21

    Let’s be honest: the SEC’s enforcement was chaotic, but it forced accountability. The CFTC’s ‘clarity’ is just regulatory arbitrage dressed up as innovation. Spot ETH ETFs? That’s not a win-it’s a casino license for hedge funds. And the CLARITY Act? A legislative shell game. ‘Decentralized’? ‘Mature’? Who defines that? A committee of former SEC lawyers? The market isn’t voting-it’s being manipulated by the same players who’ve been running this game since 2017. This isn’t progress. It’s rebranding.

  • Vijay Kumar

    Vijay Kumar

    December 20, 2025 AT 15:49

    You think this is about Bitcoin? It’s not. It’s about who controls the future of money. The SEC wants to keep it centralized. The CFTC wants to let it evolve. But neither understands that crypto isn’t a thing to be regulated-it’s a movement. And movements don’t need permits. They need space. Stop trying to cage lightning.

  • Grace Zelda

    Grace Zelda

    December 21, 2025 AT 09:52

    Here’s the thing nobody’s saying: the SEC didn’t lose. They just realized they were fighting the future. And the CFTC? They didn’t win. They just got lucky the market moved faster than the lawyers. The real winners? The devs who built without permission. The investors who held through the chaos. The users who didn’t wait for approval. This isn’t about agencies. It’s about us. We built this. Not them.

  • Tina Detelj

    Tina Detelj

    December 22, 2025 AT 13:59

    And now, after all this, we’re left with a single, beautiful truth: the most powerful force in crypto isn’t regulation. It’s irreversibility. Once a network becomes decentralized, once users own the keys, once the code runs on thousands of machines… no agency can unmake it. The SEC can sue. The CFTC can approve. But they can’t stop a billion people from using something they believe in. That’s not a loophole. That’s evolution. And it’s already won.

  • Sam Daily

    Sam Daily

    December 23, 2025 AT 04:29

    That’s the most real thing I’ve read all week. I’ve been building a DeFi protocol for 2 years. No one gave me permission. No one said it was legal. I just coded, launched, and kept going. And now? People are using it. That’s the real victory. Not the ETFs. Not the lawsuits. The people. We’re the ones who made this happen.

  • stephen bullard

    stephen bullard

    December 23, 2025 AT 14:19

    And that’s why I’m still here. Not because of the rules. Not because of the agencies. But because of the people. The ones who didn’t wait. The ones who built anyway. That’s the future. And it’s already here.

  • Mark Adelmann

    Mark Adelmann

    December 24, 2025 AT 09:49

    Exactly. The system will always try to control. But innovation doesn’t ask for permission. It just shows up. And once it’s here? It’s too late to stop it.

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are
marked *