NFT Marketplace Royalty Policies: How ERC-2981 and Platform Rules Affect Creator Earnings

  • September

    26

    2026
  • 5
NFT Marketplace Royalty Policies: How ERC-2981 and Platform Rules Affect Creator Earnings

You minted an NFT. It sold for 1 ETH on day one. Six months later, it flips for 50 ETH. Who gets the extra 49? If you’re the artist, you might think you automatically get a cut. In reality, unless you chose your platform carefully, you might see zero dollars of that profit hit your wallet. This isn’t a glitch; it’s a feature of how current NFT Marketplace Royalty Policies work. The difference between getting paid and getting ignored often comes down to technical standards like ERC-2981 and the business models of platforms like Blur or OpenSea.

The core problem is simple: code doesn’t enforce payment by default. When you buy a physical painting, the artist rarely sees money from resale. NFTs promised to fix this with "programmable royalties." But as of late 2025, we are seeing a fragmented landscape where some platforms strictly enforce these fees, while others let collectors opt-out entirely. Understanding who controls the flow of funds-whether it’s the smart contract, the marketplace interface, or the regulatory body-is essential if you want to sustain a career in digital art or Web3 gaming.

The Technical Backbone: What Is ERC-2981?

To understand why royalties sometimes vanish, you have to look at the underlying tech. Most modern NFTs use a standard called ERC-2981. Before this, royalty logic was hard-coded into individual contracts, making it messy and incompatible across different marketplaces. ERC-2981 standardized this. It acts like a universal translator for royalty data.

Here is how it works mechanically. When a sale happens, the marketplace queries the NFT’s smart contract using a specific function: royaltyInfo(tokenId, salePrice). The contract replies with two pieces of information: the address of the person who should be paid (the receiver) and the exact amount due (the royaltyAmount). That’s it. The standard does not force the buyer to pay. It simply tells the marketplace what the price tag says. Whether the marketplace actually collects that money depends entirely on its own policy.

Key Attributes of ERC-2981 Standard
Attribute Description Typical Value/Range
Standard Name On-chain royalty standard for NFTs ERC-2981
Primary Function Returns royalty recipient and amount royaltyInfo()
Enforcement Mechanism Marketplace-dependent (not protocol-enforced) Voluntary Compliance
Calculation Unit Basis points (bps) for precision 500 bps = 5%
Compatibility Works with single and multi-token NFTs ERC-721, ERC-1155

Platform Policies: The Great Divide

If ERC-2981 just provides the data, who decides whether to collect it? The marketplaces do. And they don’t all agree. By 2025, the industry split into two distinct camps: those who treat royalties as mandatory and those who treat them as optional tips.

OpenSea, the largest general-purpose marketplace, has generally maintained a stance of enforcing royalties set by creators, though their fee structures have evolved. They integrate directly with ERC-2981 data to ensure that when you sell a Bored Ape or a CryptoPunk, the original creator gets their agreed-upon percentage. This reliability makes them a favorite for high-value trades where reputation matters.

Then there is Blur. Launched in early 2023, Blur disrupted the market by offering zero trading fees for collectors and, crucially, allowing users to bypass creator royalties. For power traders who flip assets daily, skipping a 5% royalty fee significantly improves margins. This led to a massive migration of volume away from traditional platforms. By Q4 2023, nearly 40% of NFT trading volume had shifted to royalty-agnostic platforms. While this benefits speculators, it creates a hostile environment for artists who rely on secondary sales for income.

Other platforms like Foundation and Manifold take a middle ground or strict approach. Foundation, for instance, curates its community heavily and enforces royalties rigorously, appealing to professional artists who prioritize long-term sustainability over quick flips. Manifold offers tools for creators to manage their own storefronts, giving them more control over how royalties are distributed, including splitting payments among collaborators.

Regulatory Pressure: MiCA and Beyond

While tech standards handle the mechanics, regulations are starting to shape the legal obligations. In Europe, the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation came into full effect in June 2024. Initially, critics argued MiCA ignored NFTs. However, Article 63 requires transparency in fee structures. While it doesn’t explicitly mandate royalty payments, it forces platforms to be clear about what they charge and what they pass on.

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) announced in March 2025 that they would begin formal consultations on secondary market mechanisms. This suggests that future updates to MiCA could potentially classify unpaid royalties as a form of consumer deception if a platform advertises "creator support" but allows easy circumvention.

In the UK, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has been even more proactive. Their Digital Sandbox initiative specifically looks at intellectual property rights in digital assets. An October 2024 consultation paper identified royalty non-payment as a priority area. If you are selling to UK buyers, expect stricter scrutiny on whether your platform actually delivers on its promise to pay creators.

Split scene contrasting a guarded path for enforced royalties versus a chaotic path for optional fees.

Security Risks: When Royalties Get Hijacked

Just because a royalty is defined doesn’t mean it’s safe. Hackers love targeting royalty configurations. In August 2024, a $2.3 million incident occurred where malicious actors redirected earnings from multiple collections. How? They exploited poorly secured admin keys. If the creator didn’t use a multisignature wallet (a wallet requiring multiple approvals to move funds), a single compromised key could change the royalty recipient address to the hacker’s wallet.

This highlights a critical best practice: never store your royalty payout address in a hot wallet connected to everyday transactions. Use hardware wallets or multisig setups like Safe (formerly Gnosis Safe). Additionally, time-locked updates are becoming standard. This means if you change your royalty settings, there’s a delay (e.g., 48 hours) before the new address takes effect. This gives the community time to spot suspicious changes and alert the creator.

Economic Impact: Do Royalties Kill Liquidity?

Collectors argue that high royalties kill liquidity. If I buy an NFT for 10 ETH and plan to sell it next week, a 5% royalty eats into my potential profit. Traders prefer platforms like Blur where they can keep 100% of the spread. Artists counter that without royalties, they have no incentive to create high-quality work if they only get paid once.

Data from DappRadar in Q1 2025 shows a clear trend: high-value transactions (above 1 ETH) still favor platforms with enforced royalties. Why? Because serious collectors care about provenance and supporting the ecosystem. Low-value, high-frequency trading dominates royalty-free platforms. This bifurcation means you need to choose your platform based on your asset type. Are you selling a rare piece of art meant to hold value? Go with OpenSea or Foundation. Are you selling a utility token for a game that needs high turnover? Consider royalty-optional markets.

Treasure chest with coins protected by a glowing shield against sneaky shadow creatures.

Future Trends: Protocol-Level Enforcement?

Will we ever see a world where royalties are impossible to skip? Some developers propose moving royalty enforcement to the protocol level, meaning the blockchain itself ensures payment before a transaction completes. The Ethereum Foundation’s roadmap includes discussions on this, but it’s controversial. Critics say it adds complexity and slows down transactions.

A more immediate solution gaining traction is "royalty-aware order books." On these platforms, a bid isn’t valid unless the bidder agrees to pay the specified royalty. This removes the ambiguity. If you place a bid on a platform that supports this, you are legally and technically bound to include the royalty in your offer. This hybrid approach respects market dynamics while protecting creators.

Practical Checklist for Creators

If you are launching an NFT collection today, here is how to protect your revenue:

  • Implement ERC-2981: Don’t use legacy royalty methods. Ensure your smart contract supports the standard so any compliant marketplace can read your terms.
  • Use Multisig Wallets: Set your royalty receiver to a multisig wallet, not a personal MetaMask account.
  • Choose Your Launchpad Wisely: If you target collectors, launch on platforms known for royalty enforcement. If you target traders, consider platforms with lower friction but be prepared for lower secondary income.
  • Monitor Secondary Sales: Use tools like Royalty Registry to track where your assets are being traded and ensure payouts are arriving.
  • Read the Fine Print: Check each marketplace’s current policy. Blur changed its stance multiple times in 2024. Always verify the latest terms before listing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does every NFT marketplace enforce royalties?

No. Major platforms like OpenSea and Foundation typically enforce royalties defined by the smart contract (ERC-2981). However, platforms like Blur and LooksRare allow collectors to opt-out of paying royalties, prioritizing low-cost trading over creator compensation.

What is ERC-2981?

ERC-2981 is an Ethereum Request for Comment standard that defines a common way for NFT smart contracts to report royalty information. It allows marketplaces to query the contract for the royalty recipient address and the percentage owed, but it does not force the marketplace to collect the fee.

Can I change my royalty rate after minting?

It depends on how the smart contract was written. Many modern contracts allow the owner to update royalty settings, but this usually requires a governance vote or a timelock period to prevent sudden changes that disadvantage buyers. Always check the specific contract documentation.

Are NFT royalties taxable?

In most jurisdictions, yes. Royalties received from secondary sales are generally considered income. You may also owe capital gains tax on the appreciation of the NFT if you sell it yourself. Consult a local tax professional, as rules vary by country and are evolving rapidly under regulations like MiCA in the EU.

Why did Blur stop enforcing royalties?

Blur aimed to capture market share from OpenSea by attracting high-volume traders. Allowing users to skip royalties lowered the cost of entry and increased trading frequency, which generated significant fee revenue for Blur through other mechanisms, even if it reduced direct creator income.

Similar News